Will the Ivy League's pillars crumble?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b0cf/1b0cf6222a0dee462f991f1f23026fa73420969f" alt=""
Indeed, it makes perfect sense. Historically, the quality of education a school provided (and the quality of research its faculty conducted) used to depend, at least partially, on the school's physical proximity to its resources. Leonard writes:
But the Internet has enabled collaboration without physical proximity. So an up-and-coming new-growth-theory theorist at the University of Florida can coauthor a paper with a Stanford or Harvard or Chicago professor without having to move across the country. This is a great thing -- the democratization of education. As the authors note, "If improvements in communication technology have made low-cost access at a distance possible for production purposes, then firms have lost a powerful instrument to regulate and control the accumulation and utilization of knowledge."So now that information and communication are just a few clicks away, who needs a fancy diploma and an address in Cambridge, MA to get somewhere? Not me, my friend. Not me.
This was first posted on Scienceline.org.
2 Comments:
Having spent time at both Yale and U of M, I still gotta say I prefer Yale. :) However, I'm at another Big Ten school now and my most recent paper was co-authored with a scientist back at yale, so I certainly see their point.
Hey what's up with NYU? Give us some ideas to put up at http://eucleiansociety.blogspot.com
Ed. ES
Post a Comment
<< Home